In Michelle Malkin's The eHarmony Shakedown she describes the shameful way in which the online dating site eHarmony has been treated by New Jersey's Attorney General as homosexual activists sought to force the company to provide same-sex dating services. But what is most depressing in this sad and sordid tale is eHarmony's capitulation.

We know that the homosexual activists have an agenda and will do anything to further that agenda. We know that many public figures are limp-wristed, 'reed blown in the wind' liberals, so their actions shouldn't surprise us. What I am really surprised and upset about is eHarmony's willingness to surrender, lay down and have its corporate tummy tickled. If they had a shred of principal they would have closed down. If they had any sense they would have opened up in another country where freedoms haven't been removed like they have in the United Soviet States of America (USSA).

I noticed that eHarmony advertisements were playing on various conservative talk shows today, including Dennis Prager. Another talk show host seemed to take the view that it wasn't eHarmony's fault and therefore why should people lose their livelihoods? I presume that the talk shows also welcome the advertising revenue. But this attitude is wrong. Conservative radio is now running ads for a homosexual dating site whose executives have found a way of excusing evil so they can make a buck. Where will it end?

I hope that heterosexuals will boycott the service. Not only should they find it distasteful to be dealing with a service like this but, all it would take is a computer glitch and Peter might be meeting Paul rather than Paula.